Skip to main content
Toggle navigation
Menu |
Chemical & Materials Engineering (CHME)
Search
College of Engineering
News & Events
CHME News
Announcements
Events Calendar
About CHME
Bienvenidos!
CHME Outreach
Mission Statement
Educational Objectives
Student Outcomes
Enrollment Data
Graduation Data
CHME Scholarships
Funding needs
Personnel
Students
Alumni
Faculty
Staff
Extended Faculty
Academics
Undergraduate
Graduate
Advising
Course Syllabi
Watkins Connected Learning Classroom
Minors of Study
NMSBrew
Time Blocks
Internships
AP and Transfer Credit
Academic Misconduct
Request for Reference
Research
CHME Research
Safety Requirements
Lab Commissioning
Responsibilities
Chemical Orders
Graduate Seminar
Research Facilities
CoE Research Resources
Employment
Internships
Employers of CHMEs
Career Services
Employment Posts
CHME Co-op/Internship Survey
Request for Reference
Employer Job Post Form
Administration
Assessment
CHME Conference Room
Tools for Faculty
Strategic Plan
NMSU
Chemical & Materials Engineering (CHME)
Administration
Assessment
Graduate Student Assessment
Graduate Student Assessment
technical talk assessment
Name of Reviewer
*
First
Last
Reviewer position
*
Email of Reviewer
*
Name of speaker being assessed
*
First
Last
Date of talk
*
Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
location of talk
The student demonstrated advanced skill in design of experiments or simulations.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The student demonstrated advanced skill in collection of experimental/simulated data.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The student developed an appropriate model of a system.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The student made appropriate use of the model(s).
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The student successfully presented original research.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The student presented the research in the context of relevant contemporary issues.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Select up to three strengths of the speaker
*
understanding of literature and relevance of the work
quality of experimental design
treatment and presentation of data/results
appropriateness and validity of conclusions
quality of graphics
presence, poise, pace, timing
ability to answer questions
Select up to three weaknesses of the speaker
*
understanding of literature and relevance of the work
quality of experimental design
treatment and presentation of data/results
appropriateness and validity of conclusions
quality of graphics
presence, poise, pace, timing
ability to answer questions
Scroll to Top