Skip to main content
Toggle navigation
Menu |
Chemical & Materials Engineering (CHME)
Search
News & Events
CHME News
Announcements
Events Calendar
CHME Listserv preferences
Apply
Undergraduate
Graduate
About CHME
Bienvenidos!
Mission Statement
Student Outcomes
Educational Objectives
Enrollment Data
Graduation Data
CHME Scholarships
Funding needs
Constituency
Students
Alumni
Faculty
Staff
Extended Faculty
Employers
Academics
Undergraduate
Graduate
Advising
Course Syllabi
Minors of Study
NMSBrew
CHME Project Room
Time Blocks
Internships
OXE Tutors list
Transfer Credit
Academic Misconduct
Research
CHME Research
Safety Requirements
Lab Commissioning
Responsibilities
Chemical Orders
Graduate Seminar
Research Facilities
Web of Science
CoE Research Resources
Employment
Internships
Employers of CHMEs
Career Services
Employment Posts
CHME Co-op/Internship Survey
Request for Reference
Post your Resume
CHME job seekers
Administration
Assessment
CHME EH&S
CHME Conference Room
CHME Financials
Tools for Faculty
NMSU
Chemical & Materials Engineering (CHME)
Faculty perform initial spring semester TA evaluations
Faculty perform initial spring semester TA evaluations
Map Unavailable
Date/Time
Date(s) - Sun 03/10/19
All Day
Categories
Administration
TA Evaluations
performance evaluation of teaching assistants
Instructor
*
Andersen
Brewer
Foudazi
Gulino
Houston
Jena
Luo
Manz
Mitchell
Rockstraw
Zhou
other (write in name below)
other instructor
*
Name of TA being evaluated
*
First
Last
Course
*
101
102
201
301
302
302L
303
305
306
307
311
323L
324L
352L
361
392
412
423L
424L
441
448
452
452L
455
455L
other
"other" course
*
Responsiveness (answers email in a timely manner, responds to requests)
*
4 - excellent
3 - good
2 - minimally acceptable
1 - poor
0 - unacceptable
Quality of work
*
4 - excellent
3 - good
2 - minimally acceptable
1 - poor
0 - unacceptable
Interpersonal skills with students
*
4 - excellent
3 - good
2 - minimally acceptable
1 - poor
0 - unacceptable
Overall assessment
*
4 - excellent
3 - good
2 - minimally acceptable
1 - poor
0 - unacceptable
Comments
Scroll to Top